我唔知道 Discuz! 同埋佢地有咩枱底交易，不過憑字面睇，Discuz! 既圖示係違反著作權條款。

http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/

LICENSE
I also love to hear of my work being used, feel encouraged to send an email with a link or screenshot of the icons in their new home to mjames at gmail dot com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. This means you may use it for any purpose, and make any changes you like. All I ask is that you include a link back to this page in your credits (although a giant link on every page of your website really isn't needed, contact me to discuss specifics).   



睇下上面幅圖，Discuz! 用咗幾多…

我搵極都搵唔到 Discuz! 有個 famfamfam.com 既網址。
其身不正，點樣話人唔加版權丫

[ 本帖最後由 banana_sim 於 2008-6-25 08:25 編輯 ]

咁都比你找到!!強

第二個人發現既

其實我係一個模版到搵到呢個網

唔算違反著作權條款！
有d野係無得違反著作權條款
例如: )
有d野係業界有個共息
例如apple電腦同windows咁！
facebook同wordpress
yahoo同igoogle
係美國同香港d路標都係無咩大分別，有d相同或類似都唔可以講佢違反著作權條款。
世界通用。
網路上既icon有好多都係世界通用(申請左條款例外)
好似ie既上頁，下頁，首頁都係，其他瀏覽器都相差無紀！
都係抄黎抄去，無咩大分別！
係睇下抄成，抄得叻唔叻。
抄得叻咪咩事都無告都告唔入。

E家都好多人都用DZ，咁代表好多人都認同左DZ佢原創同抄得都好成功。

PS:任何未知作者或版權狀態（牌照）嘅作品，會最終被刪除。

[ 本帖最後由 hideyoki 於 2008-6-25 09:22 編輯 ]

版權只會在版權持有人死後50年內有效。

我諗點計都冇可能個畫圖者死左50年掛

你無認真睇到 LICENSE，咪就係著作權條款。

I also love to hear of my work being used, feel encouraged to send anemail with a link or screenshot of the icons in their new home tomjames at gmail dot com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. This means you may use it for any purpose, and make any changes you like. All I ask is that you include a link back to this page in your credits (although a giant link on every page of your website really isn't needed, contact me to discuss specifics).   

佢而家係用啲圖，唔係抄功能。抄功能仲可以話，佢用啲圖係一模一樣。
我 check 過 MD5 hash 啦，一模一樣。而家證明到係一模一樣。圖係無乜可能整到一模一樣，所以一定，係一定係攞呢個 icon pack

> PS:任何未知作者或版權狀態（牌照）嘅作品，會最終被刪除。
作者講明係用 Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License。佢無話我唔理佢，不過佢而家講明呢，即係 Discuz! 有問題。
唔好話 Discuz! 整到一模一樣，而家 check 埋 md5 hash 係一模一樣，無得抵賴

[ 本帖最後由 banana_sim 於 2008-6-25 09:58 編輯 ]

其實呢樣野我好耐之前都知

只不過我都有份用 所以冇單聲

好耐之前唔知邊個提過- -

although a giant link on every page of your website really isn't needed, contact me to discuss specifics

你有冇send信去comsenz求證?

所以我話我唔知佢地係咪協議咗
我只係 send 咗信去作者到，comsenz 我都唔知邊個先係渣 fit 人

最7的四眼仔..果度無咩人唔識得.

戴志康？佢唔收信嫁
仲有，無嫌疑人會認自己做錯
所以我係寄信比個作者，唔會寄信比佢

唔係100年咩...

個著作權者有無話Discuz! 違反版權先??
問左先好出post la

我當然問咗先出啦 =.=||||

甘!仲唔行動.......
作者有無讚下你....